Back to SBU 203D

Study notes

Written and reviewed by subject experts from the same material the questions were written from. Read a note, then practise the questions it teaches.

Notes on 58 of 84 objectives.

Business Law

15 mins read · 13 questions

Explain common mistake as to the existence of the subject matter (res extincta: Couturier v Hastie), as to title (res sua: Cooper v Phibbs) and as to quality (Bell v Lever Bros).

13 mins read · 7 questions

Explain mutual (cross-purpose) mistake (Raffles v Wichelhaus).

15 mins read · 17 questions

Explain unilateral mistake as to the identity of the other party (Cundy v Lindsay; Phillips v Brooks; Lewis v Averay) and as to the nature of a document signed (non est factum: Saunders v Anglia Building Society).

14 mins read · 13 questions

Distinguish physical duress (Barton v Armstrong) from economic duress (Atlas Express v Kafco; The Universe Sentinel), and state their effect on a contract.

14 mins read · 18 questions

Distinguish actual from presumed undue influence; identify relationships that raise the presumption; explain how it is rebutted, including by independent advice (Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2)).

13 mins read · 13 questions

Define misrepresentation, distinguishing statements of fact from opinion (Bisset v Wilkinson), from statements of law and from statements of intention (Edgington v Fitzmaurice), and explain when silence may amount to misrepresentation.

14 mins read · 19 questions

Explain the requirement that the misrepresentation induced the contract.

14 mins read · 17 questions

Distinguish fraudulent (Derry v Peek), negligent (Hedley Byrne v Heller; Esso v Mardon) and innocent misrepresentation; state the remedies for each (rescission, damages) and the bars to rescission.

14 mins read · 9 questions

Explain the strict (entire) performance rule (Cutter v Powell).

15 mins read · 21 questions

Explain the modifications of the strict rule: substantial performance (Hoenig v Isaacs; Bolton v Mahadeva), acceptance of partial performance (Sumpter v Hedges), divisible contracts, performance prevented by the promisee (Planché v Colburn) and tender of performance.

13 mins read · 13 questions

Distinguish bilateral discharge from unilateral discharge.

13 mins read · 7 questions

Explain the doctrine of accord and satisfaction and how the Contracts Act, 1960 (Act 25) modifies it.

Get the course to read them

Find your course

Type your course code or its title. We show you exactly what we hold for it.

Or browse by programme