Critical thinking
This chapter is organized in three major sections. The first section looks at the meaning of Critical Thinking, its core determinants and some relevance of Critical Thinking. In the second section, we look at how Critical Thinking is displayed in clear and analytic writing. This will take us to study the different types of sentences and identify which ones lead to ambiguity and which ones...
Quick Rules
-
Time limit: 50 minutes
-
Multiple attempts are not allowed
-
All questions must be answered to submit
Share Quiz
Quiz Questions Preview
Question 1
What are the six core critical thinking skills identified in the text?
Explanation
The text identifies Interpretation, Analysis, Inference, Evaluation, Explanation, and Self-Regulation as the six core critical thinking skills.
Question 2
According to the text, what does 'Evaluation' in critical thinking entail?
Explanation
'Evaluation' involves assessing the credibility of statements or information and making judgments in a clear and thoughtful manner.
Question 3
Which of the following is mentioned as a benefit of critical thinking in everyday life?
Explanation
Critical thinking is emphasized as important in everyday activities as it helps individuals solve problems systematically.
Question 4
What does the term 'Clarity' refer to in clear writing as per the text?
Explanation
'Clarity' in writing pertains to the appropriate use of sentences and words that effectively communicate ideas without confusion.
Question 5
What is one of the roles of critical thinking in governance, as mentioned in the text?
Explanation
The text states that critical thinking is vital for governance as it enables citizens to think critically and rationally, leading to informed decision-making.
Question 6
A student is preparing a research paper, and they want to ensure they engage in critical thinking throughout their writing process. Which of the following practices best exemplifies critical thinking as outlined in the text?
Explanation
The correct answer is the second option, as it reflects the core critical thinking skill of Evaluation, where a student assesses the credibility of statements and evidence. The other options demonstrate common misconceptions about critical thinking, such as ignoring opposing viewpoints or prioritizing complexity over clarity.
Question 7
During a group discussion about a social issue, one member argues for a particular viewpoint but fails to provide evidence to support their claims. According to the principles of critical thinking discussed in the text, how should other members respond to foster a more analytical discourse?
Explanation
The correct response is the second option, which involves engaging in critical thinking by questioning and seeking clarification. This reflects the skill of Analysis in identifying relationships and evaluating arguments. The other options represent misconceptions about productive discussions, where avoiding conflict or unquestioningly agreeing hinders critical engagement.
Question 8
[Case Scenario] During a training seminar on effective communication, the facilitator posed a scenario: a journalist is tasked with writing an article about a recent political event that has caused public outcry. To gather information, the journalist needs to critically analyze the data collected from numerous sources including official statements, social media reactions, and public opinions. The facilitator emphasized the importance of clarity, coherence, and conciseness in the article's composition to avoid ambiguity. Question: Which critical thinking skill is most essential for the journalist in synthesizing this information and presenting it in a clear manner?
Explanation
In the given scenario, clarity is emphasized as crucial for the journalist to effectively communicate the complexities of the political event and ensure that the message is understood by the audience.
Question 9
[Case Scenario] A university professor is reviewing a series of essays written by students on the importance of critical thinking in their personal and academic lives. In her review, she notes that many students fail to demonstrate the core critical thinking skills identified in the chapter, such as analysis and evaluation, although they present interesting ideas. Some essays are well-organized but lack depth in critical argumentation and evidence. Question: What conclusion can the professor draw from the essays regarding the students' application of critical thinking skills?
Explanation
The students demonstrate an understanding of presenting ideas but lack the analytical and evaluative depth necessary for strong critical thinking, as the professor noted in her review of the essays.
Question 10
[Case Scenario] In a workshop aimed at developing critical writing skills, participants were introduced to the '5Cs' that contribute to clear writing: Correctness, Clarity, Conciseness, Coherence, and Control. As part of an activity, they were asked to analyze a poorly written paragraph and identify which of the '5Cs' it lacked most significantly. After group discussions, the consensus was that the writing was confusing and difficult to follow. Question: Based on this workshop experience, which 'C' did the participants determine was most critical for understanding this paragraph?
Explanation
The participants identified clarity as the most critical aspect lacking in the poorly written paragraph, as it directly impacted their ability to understand the content effectively.